b'2025 Feed Quality ComparisonsForage Quality 1RFV (%)2Crop Variety Arborg Carberry Melita Roblin AverageOats CDC Arborg139 149 117 96Oats ORe RUMINATOR127 134 97 123Oats ORe BOOST147 118 99 93Oats CDC Westgate132 132 95 86Oat Average 133 133 103 102 123Barley AB Advantage175 221 147 95Barley AB Tofield215 280 155 121Barley CDC Harness207 216 136 144Barley CDC Renegade174 235 134 106Barley Average 193 238 143 117 191Peas/Barley CDC Lewochko - AB Advantage162 285 151 108Peas/Oats DL Delicious - CDC Arborg135 156 112 87Pea/cereal Average 149 221 132 98 167Spring Triticale WCI Widdicombe148 166 121 75 128Proso Millet Crown5 137 103 104 101Foxtail Millet Siberian5 105 76 85 139Millet Average 121 90 95 120 102Sorghum Sudangrass common5 104 94 96 112Forage Sorghum common5 103 114 125 114Sorghum Average 114 95 101 117 103Cover crop blend 147 170 102 103 1311 Quality tests were done by wet chemistry and were a composite of the three plots/site.AGE CROPS FOR2 Relative feed value (RFV)3 Crude protein (CP)4 Total Digestive Nutrients (TDN)5 Due to lack of availability, common seed was used.114 Seed Manitoba 2026'